Comments on: Google Sucks http://blog.kylemulka.com/2005/12/google-sucks/ Thu, 02 Mar 2017 22:34:44 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.2 By: tom http://blog.kylemulka.com/2005/12/google-sucks/comment-page-1/#comment-1326 Sun, 26 Mar 2006 07:20:45 +0000 http://192.168.2.31/blog/?p=338#comment-1326 I guess it’s a true test of who has higher pagerank … funny how Microsoft wins.

]]> By: lesley http://blog.kylemulka.com/2005/12/google-sucks/comment-page-1/#comment-1287 Tue, 14 Mar 2006 19:02:18 +0000 http://192.168.2.31/blog/?p=338#comment-1287 Dear Sir

I am appalled by what I read here about Google.

http://www.harrysnews.com/esgoogle.htm

Perhaps this is why men are having such a hard time publicising their concerns.

Keep up the good work

Lesley

]]> By: Jeff http://blog.kylemulka.com/2005/12/google-sucks/comment-page-1/#comment-1081 Mon, 02 Jan 2006 13:16:50 +0000 http://192.168.2.31/blog/?p=338#comment-1081 Google: To call it a bug would be evil to the engine developers and the hundreds of people we employ to rank our search quality. We’re not evil, we’re Googley. We’re just trying to organize the world’s information here, gosh!

Microsoft: That’s not a bug, it’s a feature that’s “by design.” 640K results ought to be enough for anybody, and you’re mad that you’re getting 640B? Besides, we can do anything Google can do better, including produce meaningless search results.

But really, there’s also an interesting bug in Google’s mobile mail client. At a certain point my mailbox went screwy and it displays the “to” wrong in every single message. Guess they’re not so perfect after all … and to think they got all fussy with me about whether or not a particular return type must be declared ‘const’.

]]>